On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:37:27PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > On 2014-12-10 15:17, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:29:50AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > >>[...] > >>Hopefully, they will respond positively on Monday and will get engaged > >>here, and sort out their licensing so that we can all work on a single > >>implementation. > > > >monday passed long ago > >what was their response ? > >is there a reason to wait / not apply the patch in this thread ? > > Sorry, all I got was a message from them saying they are talking to > their > internal legal people about getting the licensing right, and they would > ping me when something happened - and nothing since then. I don't > see any > reason not to apply Timo's encoder. The nvidia people can hopefully > collaborate on that to add functionality. > > There has been some technical feedback from me, and others, which Timo > hasn't all responded to, but I'm ok with dealing with that after > committing > the initial implementation.
patch applied thanks to all [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the dead. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
