On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 01:43:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:57:09PM +0000, tim nicholson wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 04/12/14 16:09, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > > [..] > > > > > > This representation requires way more efforts to me to understand than the > > > one from Michael... > > > > > > > Just shows how different minds think/work ;) > > > > As the saying goes, one man's meat is another man's poison. > > > > I was going for consistency with current work (which I happened to find > > clear) and I liked having the extra detail of line numbers. > > iam fine with either but id like to see one of them or a combination > pushed. pushing neither would be worst ... > > so which solution do people prefer?
seems people dont care so applied mine, feel free to replace by something else, iam fine with any way of documenting it as long as it is documented [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have asymptotical amounts of data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
