Yes, sorry. The messages didn't seem to get sent so I tried again... and then I realised all of them got sent. Sorry for the spam.
All of them contain the same change. Let's pick this one for the review: https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-November/165157.html > From: l...@lrcd.com > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 23:12:28 -0900 > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Modified force_key_frames option to accept frame > numbers > > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 9, 2014, at 02:42 PM, Sylvester Zaluga wrote: > > ***Sending again, this time with diff*** > > You sent four similar messages to the mailing list: > > <https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-November/165155.html> > <https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-November/165156.html> > <https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-November/165157.html> > <https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-November/165158.html> > > Which one(s) should we review? > > Usually I discard extra/duplicates in the queue, but at some of them > seemed to vary slightly and I was feeling somewhat lazy. > > Lou > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
