wm4 <nfxjfg <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > For now, this message is annoying and useless for > > > non-ffmpeg.c users, and as I understand, libav* is > > > supposed to serve these users too. > > > > Why don't you reduce the log level instead? > > For what purpose?
I was under the impression that a lot of messages are currently output by the libraries and that you are against seeing one more with warning level. But I am apparently wrong? The problem with reverting the patch is that a user simply has no chance to understand why he must not provide the "right" and documented option to libavcodec in the utf-16 case as explained in the ticket. Do you see another solution for this problem? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
