> On Oct 15, 2014, at 06:00, Rodger Combs <rodger.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 05:37, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Le quartidi 24 vendémiaire, an CCXXIII, Rodger Combs a écrit :
>>> Discussed this briefly on IRC; decided this was a good idea. I'm not sure
>>> if the commit message explains it well enough; please poke me here or on
>>> IRC if it doesn't.
>> 
>>> From 617b532c8a403c1cf06e60c99e9f36c787553b43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Rodger Combs <rodger.co...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:00:02 -0500
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Make copyts a tri-state, with `no` normalizing input
>>> timestamps.
>>> 
>>> This doesn't change the default or `-copyts` behavior, but allows
>>> `-nocopyts` to make e.g. `-ss 50` have timestamps starting at 50 seconds,
>>> even if the input file's timestamps start at a value other than zero.
>>> ---
>>> ffmpeg.c     | 6 +++---
>>> ffmpeg_opt.c | 4 ++--
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> It looks like you forgot to update the documentation too.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> -- 
>> Nicolas George
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> Indeed I did. Here you go:
> <0001-Make-copyts-a-tri-state-with-no-normalizing-input-ti.patch>
> 
> It occurs to me that it might be more useful in some cases to have one master 
> input file (the first one?) be shifted so its timestamps start at zero, and 
> the rest be shifted by the same amount as the master. That might be a good 
> argument for making this its own option, instead of making copyts a tri-state.
> 
> I'm not particularly attached to the naming or implementation here, so 
> suggestions are plenty welcome :)
> 
> 
Upon some further testing, this seems to create some unusual and undesired 
behavior in some cases, and I'm not sure exactly why. The patch is definitely 
not ready, but I'd appreciate it if anyone could help work out a better design 
for the feature.

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to