On 01/10/14 5:22 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > James Almer <jamrial <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> This makes the addition of arch optimized functions easier. > > Do you think that the functions in question are bitexact > wrt the specification? > > Carl Eugen
The 53 is afaik. The 97 float isn't, which is why there's a 97 int version. How is this relevant anyway? Any simd implementation that's not bitexact would be marked as such. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
