On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:15:06AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote: > Hi, > > ----- Mail original ----- > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:45:47AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > does this ensure that the sps is before the pps ? > > > > if not that might be the reason for the warnings > > > > > > > > > > It does not. I can update this so that when the pps is seen and not > > > the sps, it prepends the sps to the pps. > > > > please do, sps should be before the pps > > > > Done, new patch attached.
probably ok, should i apply it ? > Also, it would be cool if someone had a sample with only SPS in the stream, > to check that the copy of PPS from AVCC works fine too. yes, but i suspect this could be more rare [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
