On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 09:03 +0100, tim nicholson wrote: > On 10/09/14 21:45, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 22:30 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:30:24AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Attached patch removes a request for samples of which we already > >>> have several that all work fine. > >> > >> field_dominance can have 256 different values, do we have samples > >> for all ? do they even exist ? > > > > Whilst the variable may be able to contain 256 different values in > reality there are only two possible states f1 first or f2 first. > > > As far as I recall there are only two (1, 2) and possibly "unknown" (0). > > > > Is there a distinction between "unknown" and "progressive"? I don't have > the numbers to hand.
Unknown means unknown. If it's an optional field it probably means the muxer that made the file is crap, which is not uncommon. /Tomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
