On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:32:08PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23.09.2014, at 02:27, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:01:26AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:42:53AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Maybe more readable if you do reindentation separately?
> > 
> > yes, will do
> > 
> > 
> >> Because I was going to suggest to use elif until I saw that that part
> >> is not actually used.
> > 
> >> Also doesn't this patch also add --enable-sdl? Seems it will be ignored,
> >> shouldn't we rather fail if --enable-sdl was given but we do not find
> >> it? I believe that is how FFmpeg configure normally behaves.
> > 
> > posted a seperate patch for that
> 
> I _think_ they are all ok, but I did only a quick review and no testing.

applied the sdl patches

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know
nothing. -- Socrates

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to