wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote in news:20140804213955.42443190@debian:
> the problem is obviously that uclibc provides a fminf prorotype, but no > implementation. Obviously this breaks any application that attempts to > detect fminf, and provides its own fallback if it doesn't appear to > exist. > > Why do you think ffmpeg should be patched for this, and not uclibc? Hi, you are right, uClibc should be patched, not ffmpeg. A patch for uClibc is already available: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/392465/ Sorry for the noise ;) Regards, Bernd _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
