On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 07:36:19PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le jour de la Récompense, an CCXXII, Clément Bœsch a écrit : > > Doesn't this need at least a minor bump? > > I consider it a bug fix, not an API change. Can you imagine a case where > people would need to check for it? >
One case that might break is when used as a callback. That's very unlikely to happen, but it's still a change in the public API. You might get some rainbow colors from http://upstream-tracker.org/ typically. > > Not really; in SAMI at least the buffer is allocated only once, and > > finalized only at the end. This behaviour could be adopted in other > > text subtitles demuxers. > > That makes sense, but you still could do it with an extra argument to select > between finalize, clear and nothing. > Yeah maybe. That function will be dropped anyway, it's just in order to ease the transition to the next API. [...] -- Clément B.
pgpaH5UGeQuM7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
