On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:13:27PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:36:14 +0200 > Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:31:42PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 19:12:56 +0200 > > > Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Should we add git tags to the revissions where releases are branched > > > > off ? > > > > > > > > that way a "git describe" on master would look like: > > > > n2.5-dev-3-gb227be3 > > > > instead of: > > > > n2.0-11670-gb227be3 > > > > > > > > (or any other tag than n2.5-dev that we choose) > > > > > > > > it would not affect the "./version.sh" output > > > > > > > > > > That sounds like an interesting idea. But just using the release tag > > > name and appending "-dev" might be harmful for scripts which try to > > > automatically pickup the latest version or such. > > > > what tag name would you suggest ? > > (note we cannot really change it once we create and push these tags) > > > > [...] > > Don't know. Maybe "dev-n2.5" or "after-n2.5" I'm not sure.
I prefer -dev as suffix, in case someone wants to make a small bikeshed vote. -- Clément B.
pgphB8_HPBM9I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
