On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:36:53AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-08-14 4:30 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>: > >> probably ok > > > > applied > > Now that I think of it, this change causes older versions of ffmpeg to > be unable to decode the output of the fixed encoder. So: > - Should we bump eg a minor version number to let any decoder have the > possibility to detect this change?
some minor or micro bump surely is a good idea > - Should the alignment (or non-alignment) be an option instead? this is a possibility, iam not sure how many user it would have though most people aware of it would likely upgrade their decoder side if they can > > Problem is that those older ffmpeg-generated dpxs may not be > spec-compliant, but if most decoders don't know how to handle the > supposedly spec-compliant ones, then we actually have caused more harm > than good. > > I hate having cans of worms as breakfast. > -- > Christophe > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
