On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 13:25:03 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le tridi 23 thermidor, an CCXXII, wm4 a écrit : > > Unfortunately, FFmpeg vehemently resists against enabling lavr by > > default. > > If someone cared enough, they would be making their case: posting > benchmarks, listing features present in each library but absent in the > other, comparing the APIs to see which one is most convenient for which > task, etc. You seem to be under the impression that this matters. I don't want to have to develop for two slightly similar but different APIs, the end. And I don't want anyone else having to do that either. You're welcome to add a lavr API wrapper to swr, or to merge swr features into lavr, or to convince Libav to pick up swr in favor of lavr - just don't torture me with your API wars, OK? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
