On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 10:16:25PM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote: > Den 04. aug. 2014 21:58, skrev Reimar Döffinger: > >*scratches head* I wonder now if you misunderstood or if you discarded the > >variant I pointed out due to effort/complexity? > > Or because I don't know all the parts of the ffmpeg code well enough.
I grouped that under "misunderstood" :) > Since both you and others has suggested that this is a good way to do it, I > will look into it and see how it can be done. Thanks for your answers. It would be very welcome (at least by me). But, I have to say that it will lead down a path with lots of unknowns and risks. So while I'd be really happy for you to work in this direction, I think I should be so fair to say there's a risk that you might decide to give up on it in the end and then have to do one of the other approaches anyway. Regards, Reimar _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
