Le quintidi 15 thermidor, an CCXXII, Stefano Sabatini a écrit : > It shall probably execute the remaining part of the function even in > case of failure.
I am not completely sure about that. AFAIK, we consider most filtering failures fatal at some point or another anyway. > I find this a bit confusing. Can you explain why the NOP metaframe is > needed? Depending on the type of the message and the default action taken, filters may need to inhibit the default action because they already did the work or changed something else somewhere that would conflict. I can remove that hunk and wait for something to actually use it if you prefer. > LGTM otherwise. Thanks to everyone for the reviews. New series posted. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
