On 25.07.2014 11:25, db0 company wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
<andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 25.07.2014 10:59, db0 company wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
<andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
It would be great, if you could also include copyright and license here.
The website currently doesn't have any license, so the less/css.
I think we should add one, but I'm not sure I'm able to do that since
I'm not the only contributor.
While it would be nice if the website had a proper license, it's not really
important. But it is necessary that anything ending up in the release
tarball, like the style.min.css, has a proper license.
As git blame tells me that you are the only contributor to style.css and
thus the copyright holder, you can choose a license for it.
The style.min.css also contains the bootstrap.min.css, but that has a MIT
license anyway.
Since the style in the release is the one generated from the website,
it has to be the same license. If we add a license to the css/less,
then it's better to have the same on the whole website.
Sure it's better to have the same license for the whole website, but it
would also be fine if there were several, but compatible licenses.
I'll add one.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
