On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > On Thursday 19 June 2014 01:32:58 am Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:02:59PM -0400, Dave Rice wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On May 7, 2014, at 6:41 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > > Nicolas George <george <at> nsup.org> writes: > > > >>> I thought this would anger both users and downstream > > > >>> (who paid for the removal of EXPERIMENTAL iirc) and I > > > >>> intended to keep the profile low for this controversy. > > > >> > > > >> Well, this ticket obviously shows that the removal of > > > >> EXPERIMENTAL was premature. > > > > > > > > Sorry, I assumed this was well known for all developers. > > > > (See also the large number of tickets opened > > > > immediately after the removal.) > > > > > > ping > > > > the patch breaks fate > > New patch attached that compiles (!) and passes fate. > > Please comment, Carl Eugen
> libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c | 5 ++++- > tests/fate/vcodec.mak | 4 ++-- > tests/fate/video.mak | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) it seems libopenjpeg is not able to decode the files generated with libopenjpeg. That is with the libopenjpeg from ubuntu 12.04 (1.3+dfsg-4+squeeze2build0.12.04.1) but ubuntu 14.04 ships a variant of 1.3 too test done with: ./ffmpeg -threads 1 -i matrixbench_mpeg2.mpg -vframes 1 -vcodec libopenjpeg -format j2k test.j2k ./ffplay -vcodec libopenjpeg test.j2k [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet notwithstanding go out to meet it. -- Thucydides
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
