2010/1/12 Anders Logg <l...@simula.no>:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:32:13PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:2010/1/12 Marie Rognes <m...@simula.no>: >Kristian Oelgaard wrote: >> >> >>2010/1/12 Marie Rognes <m...@simula.no>: >>> >>>Anders Logg wrote: >>>> >>>>We've come pretty far on the rewrite of FFC and only a few functions >>>>remain. As far as I can see, it remains to implement code generation >>>>for the following functions: >>>> >>>>Kristian: >>>> >>>> code["evaluate_basis_all"] = not_implemented >>>> code["evaluate_basis_derivatives"] = not_implemented >>>> code["evaluate_basis_derivatives_all"] = not_implemented >>>> >>>>Marie: >>>> >>>> code["tabulate_entity_dofs"] = not_implemented # Marie doesn't know >>>>what >>>>this function should do >>>> code["tabulate_coordinates"] = not_implemented # Marie doesn't believe >>>>in >>>>this function >>>> >>>>Marie or Kristian: >>>> >>>> code["interpolate_vertex_values"] = not_implemented >>>> >>>>In addition, we need to get the code generation for the integral >>>>classes working. It's sort of working for the tensor representation >>>>but not at all (?) for the quadrature representation. I'll be working >>>>on getting the tensor representation completely in place. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>How are things going? >>> >>>I'm have a bug or two to fix in evaluate_dof for integral moments and >>>will >>>then fix evaluate_dofs. >>>Need to sort out FIAT normal directions before correct code is generated >>>for >>>RT/BDM though. >>>Otherwise good. >>> >>>Can we move the prefetching of the various format["..."] into the global >>>scope of codegeneration.py >>>or is that evil? >> >>We need to do something different with the way we handle the formatting. >>At the moment we just import format from cpp in codegeneration.py, but that >>is clearly not an option if one wants to generate different code. >> > >Do we have any examples of different code that we want to generate? Currently not.Initially, I had in mind that one would like to generate different code as an option (maybe Fortran) but it hasn't happened yet. So for now it's just a convenient way to make it easy to edit how the code is formatted in one single place without needing to search for +, * etc throughout the code.
Yes, I totally agree. And when/if we decide to generate Fortran I will be very surprised if simply feeding the new format will work out of the box anyway. Kristian
Another issue is cpp.py importing FFC_OPTIONS which will lead to some difficulties I think w.r.t. format["epsilon"].Yes, it's an issue. It's something we need to sort out. I'll get to it in time. -- AndersKristian_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktM0jsACgkQTuwUCDsYZdGJzwCfUsPOQ5MgiB1+GE9y6xUsEzYy JtMAn14KSOisUYkuMq/2wlfzyz/4YpFu =IwLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : ffc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
