Hi guys.With banaction as above my _fail2ban_ inject rules into _default_ zone - is this by design or I misconfigured my setup? The way _fail2ban_ does it for me seems to me, is broken, defeats the purpose - no? _zone_ when in use will(should) use a given iface(s) - in my case it's a zone with one specific, public-facing interface, which zone is not "default" zone so... what _fail2ban_ does is, well.. useless.
This must not be a bug ? what am I missing in terms of config?
I'm on Centos 9 with ver. 1.3.4 many thanks, L.
_______________________________________________ Fail2ban-users mailing list Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
