I think you want sudo fail2ban-client status ‘jail name ‘

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:10 AM, Nick Howitt <n...@howitts.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> It is all to do with the sequence of events on your box and which element f2b 
> is trying to detect. As an example I've just had a similar message with the 
> postfix-sasl jail. An IP made a connection at 13:43:38 and failed 
> authentication in /var/log/secure at 13:43:38 and 13:43:41. These failures 
> hit the maillog at 13:43:41 and 13:43:43. F2b is detecting based in maillog 
> messages (there is no IP information in the secure log). F2b found the first 
> failure in the maillog at 13:43:41,003 and immediately banned at 
> 13:43:41,117. It then found the second failure at 13:43:43,298 but as the IP 
> was already banned at that point, at 13:43:44,223 I received the "already 
> banned" message.
> 
> It can happen more on disconnect type of events as well as you may already 
> have existing open connections when f2b kicks in, and all the open 
> connections will disconnect after f2b has made the block.
> 
> Nick
> 
>> On 01/10/2018 01:06, James Moe via Fail2ban-users wrote:
>>> On 9/30/18 4:35 PM, James Moe via Fail2ban-users wrote:
>>> 
>>>   How do I ask iptables what is banned by fail2ban?
>>> 
>>   Found it:
>> $ iptables --list-rules f2b-assp
>> 
>>   And here is the entry for the example IP:
>> -A f2b-assp -s 185.36.81.145/32 -j REJECT --reject-with
>> icmp-port-unreachable
>> 
>>   I have further noticed that the other jail, suricata, does not have
>> this issue even though the configuration is almost identical.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fail2ban-users mailing list
> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users


_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Reply via email to