I'm not sure I follow..... I have 2 static IP's with my DSL provider. They do authentication my MAC address. So I will not be able to bind 2 static IP's to 1 NIC. (?)
I will have two networks in the office. Network (a) for 20 or so computers to surf the net and play LAN games. Network (b) for my webservers email servers etc. I assume network (a) can connect to 1 Nic on the box lets say network 10.10.10.x Network (b)to another NIC and will be on 192.168.0.x. I guess my question can static routes do all this? Also how will internet connection sharing work? Or should I just leave that GUI alone? Thanks in advance guys!! Dan -----Original Message----- From: Lieven Van Acker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 1, 2002 7:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] 4 LAN cards Hi, I suppose you only have one DSL connection, connected to only one ethernet interface. It will be this interface's mac that's used for autenthication with your DSL provider. The other NIC's and their resp. MAC addresses are not taken into account for connecting your DSL. So, as long as your outgoing connection only uses 1 IP address, there won't be a problem, no mather wich and how many NIC's / IP's you use for your internal LANs. Of course, if you are provided with only one registered, public available IP address, you will use NAT to hide your internal configuration from the outside world. >From your configuration, I think 3 NICs will suffice: 1 connected to DSL provider 1 for your office subnet 1 for your servers subnet Each interface will have a primary IP. Outgoing traffic to your provider will be masqueraded, unlike ip-traffic between your office and servers subnet. If you want to host a number of services on this router/gateway, you can choose to assign some more virtual IP-addresses to your internal interfaces (office/servers subnet). To control and protect the traffic, you have several options. Bundled with linux mandrake comes shorewall (9.0) - controlled with mandrake control panel, guarddog (don't know if it's in standard edition, mandrake packages are available on the developer's site) - provides it's own graphical user interface to control the rules, and a bunch of other tools from very low to higher level control. Regards, Lieven Op zo 01-12-2002, om 14:37 schreef Belkie, Dan: > Sweet!!!! > > This might do the trick *BUT* > > My DSL provider does authentication via the card mac address..... Because of > this I don't think they will let me have 2 IP's to 1 mac..... > > > thoughts? > > d. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Franki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: December 1, 2002 6:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [expert] 4 LAN cards > > > yes, there is a better way.. > > you can have multiple IP's assigned to one ethernet card... > > so for example: > > eth0 = 203.59.87.254 > eth0:0 = 203.59.6.252 > eth0:1 = xxx.xxx.xx.xxx > > eth1: some other IP. > eth1:1 another IP. > > I have a linux box with three network cards in it.. > > 1 is for the ADSL connection and hosting the live public IP's associated > with it. > 2 is for a 192.168.0.0/24 network > 3 is for a 10.0.x.x network... > > using /etc/sysconfig/static-routes you can make the whole lot talk to each > other.. > > > rgds > > Frank > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Belkie, Dan > Sent: Sunday, 1 December 2002 8:58 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [expert] 4 LAN cards > > > Hey Guys! > > Ok I have a box, acting as a firewall / router. All is good. It has 2 NIC > cards in it of course.... > > Ok now I might be going way out, and maybe someone can tell me a better way > to do this....... > > I have 2 static IP's and I want them both to run into the same box. > > I want to put 4 NIC cards in the box. 2 (1 for each static IP) and 2 for > non-routable. > > The reason for this... I want to have some mail servers and webservers on > one network (192.168.0.1) and then have another network for the office > (10.10.10.1) I would like to have my office people able to surf the net and > be on a dif subnet then the webservers.. so no one monkeys around.... > > Is this a good way to do it? Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks > Dan > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Lieven Van Acker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ELiSA
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
