On Fri, 31 May 2002 14:11:53 -0500 "J. Craig Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alfredo C.Lopez" wrote: > > > > > > Meanwhile I will try to compile glibc 2.2.4 and try to install it in > > another directory... (may be under /usr/local/ or /opt/lib that is > > shared between the machines). And test some precompiled binaries > > (may be extract some binaries from the rpm packages) that need the > > 2.2.4 library, changing the LDPATH environmet variable. > > I hope it didn't explode. > > > > Thanks!!! > > ALF > > > > For the reasons I specified in my earlier post, I do not think this > will work but if you are intent on experimenting, please keep us > posted on your results. It would be very interesting to see if you can > sucessfully hack a dual GLIBC setup that will actually work. > > Thanks ALF, > drjung I second that request in fact making it work and making it duplicable is worthy of a white paper, and could be presented at a conference or two. With 3.1 looming on the horizon this is of great benefit to all of us. I for one would be willing to verify your methodology on my own box if you need it. (my home directory is backed up .... I'll suffer the "trashing" if I have to.) James > > -- > J. Craig Woods > UNIX/NT Network/System Administration > http://www.trismegistus.net/resume.html > Character is built upon the debris of despair --Emerson > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
