On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:13:31PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Thu Dec 06, 2001 at 02:46:14PM -0600, David Wollmann wrote: > > > I just downloaded several mdk 7.1 update RPMs from: > > > > ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/mandrake/updates/7.1 > > > > I ran `rpm --checksig ...' against the downloaded RPMs and noticed that > > two of them do not have valid GPG signatures: > > > > > > tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK > > tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: MD5 GPG NOT OK > > > > > > I haven't checked these files on other servers. > > > > Any chance we can get someone to check this out and see what the problem > > is? > > I assume you have the security team gpg keys installed? (Of course > you do, otherwise they would all fail). I know the files are fine > because: > > (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$ rpm --checksig tetex* > tetex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-afm-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-doc-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-dvilj-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-dvips-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-latex-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > tetex-xdvi-1.0.7-6.1mdk.i586.rpm: md5 gpg OK > (vdanen@logan: /mnt/updates/BIG/updates/7.1/RPMS)$ > > Can you do a "rpm --checksig -v" on the two packages and see exactly > what fails? You may have had a bad download.
I ran rpm with the verbose switch and the MD5 chksums are bad, _not_ the signatures. I'll have a go with a couple other download methods and see if I can get better results. -- David Wollmann ICQ: 10742063
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
