Heh, The point wasn't taken though.
It's sorta silly to try to put the blame on Linux for "regressing". Yeah he can run command line Linux in 64 megs (even 32 after installation). If he really wants to do this, he should have been looking for one of the super "light" distros, instead of LM8.1. BTW: I had to look up trenchant. Good word. :) -JMS |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J. Craig Woods |Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:09 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [expert] How to know in what memory a certain |programme/data resides? | | |"Jose M. Sanchez" wrote: |> |> 64MB? |> |> Isn't that the MINIMUM size for a video graphics board nowadays... ;) |> |> | |> |You say "all" as if 64M is a lot of RAM. Yes, I must tell |you that X |> |will eat that much RAM for breakfast but so will most other current |> |OS's running some kind of GUI crap.... |> | | |Jose, such trenchent wit... | |I love it, and, yes, in today's world of graphic intensive |games and apps, you need at least that amount on the video card alone. | |-- |J. Craig Woods |UNIX/NT SA | |-Art is the illusion of spontaneity- |
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
