Mark> At any rate it would be very helpful and cut down on a lot of
    Mark> extra traffic if you would please add a reply-to header to the
    Mark> message headers. It's been missing for quite some time now and
    Mark> while I can't speak for others, for myself and Pine it would be
    Mark> REAL nice not to have to "remove" all the other address when all I
    Mark> really want to do is reply to the list and not to the author's
    Mark> home address and however many others were copied on the message.

As I've explained in other messages, it's generally a bad idea for mailing
list managers to replace or insert Reply-To: headers in the mail they
forward along.  While it may seem to be a convenience to have it, you *will*
regret it the first time you accidentally send a message to the list that is
intended just for the person whose message you are replying to.  If Pine
doesn't allow you to easily edit headers, get a mail user agent that works
well with editors like Emacs or vi.  I happen to use VM, a standard package
bundled with Emacs and XEmacs, but I'm sure there are others that provide
similar features.

-- 
Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(847)971-7098

Reply via email to