I do not believe the qt 2 is fully upward compatible with qt 1, so I'd
suggest installing qt 2 without removing qt 1.
Ivan wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to install the latest version of nethack which requires the
> qt 2.1.0 or better. When I try to install the package there is a list
> of decpenancies about three miles long that will be broken. Most of
> then are kde apps. They all want libqt.so.1. After the list the core
> dumps (?) . My question is: will it totaly mess things up if I upgrade
> with out looking for dependancies? I would think that an upgrade should
> be backwards compatible. There are two that need qt-egcs-10x.
>
> Also I wonder how functional usb support for modems and zip drives are
> in 7.0. has any one had any luck?
>
> If anyone cares to you could tell me what file the fsck -l looks for. I
> think it is a secret.
>
> Thanks for the use of your "brainwidth"
>
> Ivan
--
"Brian, the man from babble-on" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian T. Schellenberger http://www.babbleon.org
Support http://www.eff.org. Support decss defendents.
Support http://www.programming-freedom.org. Boycott amazon.com.
