Anyone else having problems with rpc.lockd not starting at boot
time?  There's a check in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock file, in the form

        # don't start lockd if kernel-linus.
        if ! grep -q mdk /proc/version;then
                echo -n "Starting NFS lockd: "
                daemon rpc.lockd
                echo
        fi


The comment states that this should NOT run lockd if you're running
kernel-linus.  Forgive me if I'm wrong here, but doesn't the "if"
statement do just the opposite; no lockd if kernel-x.x.xx-xmdk,
otherwise
run lockd if kernel-linus?  Therefore, no working nfs locking if you're
running an mdk kernel.  Is there some reason I don't know about for
ditching NFS locking?  I've fixed the nfslock script here and gotten
lockd
running since we really can't do without it (too many *NIX boxen of
sundry
falvors), but I was just wondering if this was a typo or if I'm actually
missing something crucial.  Also, I should mention that, earlier in the
nfslock script, these two tests appear;

[ -x /sbin/rpc.lockd ] || exit 0
[ -x /sbin/rpc.statd ] || exit 0

Note that, at least on the 7.1 installs I've done so far, all the rpc.*
daemons are in /usr/sbin, not /sbin, another test that bombs out the
script.  Small problems, admittedly, but not so trivial when the number
of
machines gets large enough.

<2:00AM coffee-deficient complaint of the day below>

Otherwise, I like 7.1.  The only complaint I have is the new menu
structure; rather caught me by suprise.  It works fine, no complaints
there, but since we have a lot of off-the-wall software, I'd spent a lot
of time generating custom KDE and Gnome menus that were consistent
across
the network.  Needless to say, it didn't really survive the upgrade in a
seamless fashion, but it's fixed now.  Some warning that I was about to
trash 14 months work everytime I added a package would have been nice,
but
it's my fault anyway...

-- 
Lee Burnside -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phys.ttu.edu/~tljlb/

"Many a good hanging prevents a bad marriage."
                --The Bard

Reply via email to