At 11:33 AM 04/12/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Sorry, but yet another opinion....
>
>I find that a good operating system has a reason for everything and when I
>finally understand the O/S, I agree with the reasons. This has been true of
>AOS/VS (ok, anybody remember that one?), O/S-9, CPM, RSTS, VM, MVS,
>Unix/XENIX/Linux and others. The O/S that resembles a Kommitee Kludge and is
>supposed to be easy to configure is the one I never seem to agree with its
>conventions. But maybe after all these years I just don't understand NT yet.
>
Huh, what does this have to do with missing libraries. or is this to help
me with knews?
Jim
