The only way to make the c++ compiler work as I need (SIGSEGV in very
complicated commercial libraries) was to substitue whole the compilers by RH
6.0 :-(.
> ----------
> De: Shane Owenby[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves 18 de noviembre de 1999 21:14
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brian Watt
> Asunto: [expert] libstdc++/IBM Java problem.
>
> If this isn't the correct list for this question please flame away,
> but I didn't know who would be best to contact about this at mandrake.
>
> <excerpt from the java guy who is doing this testing>
> I'm wondering what Mandrake 6.1 has done to libpthread-0.8.so. The
> RedHat 6.0 lib is 235,419 bytes and the Mandrake 6.1 lib is only
> 79,218. Whoa! I've tried it here, and it has helped greatly reduce the
> SIGSEGVs (w/o JIT) and hangs (w/ JIT) on Mandrake 6.1. However, I
> agree "Use at your own risk."
> </excerpt from the java guy who is doing this testing>
>
> From the java-apache-users list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/msg0
> 6280.html
>
> ATM, IBM is recommending people rm the pthread lib that came with
> Mandrake 6.1 and put the RH 6.1 pthread library in its place.
>
> Questions.
>
> 1. Why the size diff in the 2 libs?
>
> 2. Are you aware of the diff?
>
> Which is the best address for inquiries like this about Mandrake?
>
> If I haven't given you enough info to be useful please let me know,
> and I will get what ever info you need.
>
> Thanks
> Shane Owenby
> IBM Linux Technology Center
>
