On Sun, 05 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> While I agree a UPS is the way to go, the original post from this user
> stated that in his opinion, Windows handled loss of power better than
> Linux and that if he needed to have a UPS because Linux didn't take well
> to having it's lifeline cut (aka AC), Windows would be an overall
> cheaper solution. Please note I do not agree that Windows is any better
> in this situation. After rolling out several thousand NT boxes, I know
> just how well NT handles power outages. It doesn't. Win95/98 may be
> better in this respect, but who wants to run Win95/98 when you can run
> Linux?
>
Right...that was my point. :-) Windows is NOT better about it than
Linux, at least in the long run. IMNSHO, you'll have to reinstall
MUCH more often due to corrupt FS and such with Windows! :-)
John
