On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Tom Berger wrote:
> On Mit, 21 Apr 1999, you wrote: / Am Mit, 21 Apr 1999 schrieben Sie:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 11:42:08PM +0200, Tom Berger wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > Boy, what a mess...
> > > I installed/upgraded gtk 1.2.0 and glib 1.2.0. The gtk-packages
> > > (libs+devel) were vanilla Redhat rpms, glib had to be compiled because the
> > > RH lib-rpm is linked against some strange glibc version (pre-dependent
> > > libraries have a CC2 tag *shrug*, devel installed fine, though).
> > > Trouble is I don't get *anything* compiled which is linked against gtk
> > > 1.2.0.
> > 
> > [ big snip ...  sorry Tom! ]
> > 
> > > Last chance would be compiling gtk by myself, too. Duh... Is there anyone
> > > in here who got *all* the rpms installed (gtk/gtk-devel, glib/glib-devel)
> > > and has since then successfully compiled a source against them? If so,
> > > would you please tell me as exactly as possible which versions you did
> > > use? 
> > 
> > Here are the packages that I downloaded from the GNOME mirrors.  I _have_
> > been able to compile things against these packages.  Good luck!
> > 
> > 
> [big snip ... sorry Steve! :-)]
> 
> Thanks a lot! BTW: do you have a T1 or are you affiliated with one of the
> GNOME guys? Looks like a monster download...

Heh, nope!  It's just me and my little 56k modem.  From looking at the
backups, the whole thing is around 30M of download.  Not TOO bad.  Of
course, you probably don't need to grab ALL of them if you're not interested
in running GNOME.  If you just want to be able to compile glib/gtk+
programs, you could probably get away with downloading the glib-1.2, glib10,
gtk+-1.2, gtk+10 and the appropriate -devel packages.

Good luck!

-- 
Steve Philp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to