On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:53 PM Jeremy Harris via Exim-users < exim-users@lists.exim.org> wrote:
> On 22/01/2025 12:35, Slavko via Exim-users wrote: > > IMO, it can work, but will be less than optimal > > Yeah, abusing the retry mech for this (I assume the > delay is to permit manual inspection of outbound messages) > is not wonderful. > > I'd be tempted to divert the message to an alternate named-queue. > The true intention is to delay emails from the sender from hitting the Mailman3 ML. That way we can decide on its (in)appropriateness to our Mailing List. Sender -> Exim -> Mailman3 -> Mailing List subscribers - for now, we cause Exim not to deliver it to MM3 until we decide. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## exim-users-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
