Hello exim-users, I'm a developer looking to support RRVS (RFC 7293) in our internal fork of exim, and would like to hear if it is also benificial for you to have this available upstream. In short, this extension protects senders from delivering a message to an address that has changed its owner since some point in time.
It looks like facebook supports this since 2014, and if your mail service allows re-registration of the same local-part by another user after the old mailbox is deleted, the new owner will not get password reset link for old owners' facebook account if RRVS is supported by MTA/MDA. Or if your service allowed such re-registration, but stopped doing so, without RRVS this could still haunt your users decades after.. Please respond if you have any thoughts on RFC 7293, and/or arguments for having it (un)supported in exim. Thanks, Max -- ## subscription configuration (requires account): ## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/ ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account): ## exim-users-unsubscr...@lists.exim.org ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
