On Sat, 7 Jan 2023, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
On 2023-01-06, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]> wrote:
You could perhaps configure to not attempt to sign such messages
by using a suitable expansion for dkim_domain. If you can't
use something like $sender_address then $max_received_line_length
might work.
Or I could just reject them on receipt - they're spam, anyway.
But the question was, why is this panic-worthy? I thought the paniclog
was supposed to indicate that exim is seriously broken, not just
encountering some malformed email.
IIUC the message was lost, which exim considers to be a big deal
(though you know better in this instance).
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[email protected]
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
