Dňa 29. septembra 2022 16:32:33 UTC používateľ Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users <exim-users@exim.org> napísal: >On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:11:35PM +0000, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
>SHOULD NOT is not "MUST NOT". Especially if the signatures are one's >own from a prior internal SMTP relay hop. And there is RFC policy, >there are times even good reasons to ignore "MUST NOT". Yes, internal flow is the most obvious reason, for which IMO most/many of "SHOULD NOT" exists. That is why i do not commented, if original poster have nor haven't do it. >The imperative terms in RFCs are about what is necessary to be sure >to interoperate. If one is willing to occasionally risk not being >able to interoperate, one can freely ignore all RFC requirements, >at one's own risk. Of course, that is main reason of RFCs. But people often do not read/understand RFCs and use various tutorials, often with questionable quality. regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
