On 4/22/21 3:37 AM, Wayne via Exim-users wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:21:02PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote: >> On 21/04/2021 19:59, Wayne via Exim-users wrote: >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:48 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY DKIM: validation error: LONG_LINE >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:48 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY DKIM: Error during validation, >>> disabling signature verification: LONG_LINE >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:48 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY <= XXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXXX >>> H=XXXXXXXXXXXXX (PowerXpert-00-20-85-FC-86-BE) [X.X.X.X] P=esmtp K >>> S=1684783 id=0_0d_-1_1032 >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:49 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY DKIM: signing failed: LONG_LINE >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:50 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY => XXXXXXXXXXX@XXXXXXXXXXX R=dnslookup >>> T=remote_smtp S=1703743 H=XXXXXXXXXXX.mail.protection.outlook.com >>> [104.47.61.36]:25 X=TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256 CV=yes K C="250 >>> 2.6.0 <0_0d_-1_1032> [InternalId=23656679878773, >>> Hostname=DM6PR12MB4747.namprd12.prod.outlook.com] 1711342 bytes in 0.383, >>> 4354.433 KB/sec Queued mail for delivery" DT=1s >>> 2021-04-21 14:34:50 1lZDwB-0003pb-TY Completed >> A line in the message is overly long. The maximum line length that MTAs must >> support is dictated by standards. >> -- >> Cheers, >> Jeremy > Thank you for your response. > > Does this include lines in the body of the messages or just the headers? > I think the body of the message may voilate the limit, and of course, > the message is generated by firmware so I won't be able to correct this. > I was hoping EXIM would only examine header lines in order to sign the > message. > > Thanks, > Wayne > https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20200211.123605.307cbce7.nl.html
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
