On 27/07/2020 19:45, Jamie Barnes via Exim-users wrote:> I've been avoiding
check_local_user (since it tries to chdir into home directories that the exim
user has no access to), so I don't think I have access to $local_part_data (as
nothing populates it).
Not so. Any lookup done by a local_parts= condition on a router
also sets it.
You didn't show the routers calling these transports.
> in need of an alternative for the following two transports, where I need to
> be able to store *any* received mail (not handled by earlier
> routers/transports)
Transports are only run when called by a router...
> local_delivery:
> driver = appendfile
> file = ${if or{{bool{$acl_m_localdiscard}}
> \
> {bool{${lookup{$local_part}
> \
> lsearch{/etc/passwd}
> \
> {no}
> \
> {yes}}}}}
> \
> {/dev/null}
> \
>
> {/var/spool/mail/${sg{$local_part}{BADFILECHARS}{_}}}}
The discard invoked by the /dev/null choice could be done by
a router (redirect, to :blackhole:). Doing that would simplify this to
file = /var/spool/mail/${sg{$local_part}{BADFILECHARS}{_}}
... and then we can detaint easily with a lookup rather than the ${sg}
file = /var/spool/mail/${lookup{$local_part}lsearch,ret=key{/etc/passwd}}
(whether you need any further cleaning depends on your policies on username
creation).
Depending on the router calling this transport, you might be able to do the
lookup there, populating $local_part_data for use here.
> user = ${if or{{bool{$acl_m_localdiscard}}
> \
> {eqi {$local_part}{root}}
> \
> {bool{${lookup{$local_part}
> \
> lsearch{/etc/passwd}
> \
> {no}
> \
> {yes}}}}}
> \
> {mail}
> \
> {$local_part}}
This looks like it uses the same lookup or value as the file= option.
> local_unhandled:
> driver = appendfile
> create_directory = yes
> directory = /var/spool/exim/unhandled/\
> ${sg{$domain}{BADFILECHARS}{_}}/\
> ${sg{$local_part}{BADFILECHARS}{_}}/\
> $tod_logfile
This transport is much harder to deal with. Currently you have to use
one of the gross hacks presented as a get-out-of-jail-free, to
obtain untainted strings for that path. I hate them, but there were
always going to be ways for shooting oneself in the foot.
I fully expect them to be cargo-culted, probably via serverfault.
Hint: Use a lookup which matches anything, and returns the key.
I'm not happy with the situation either - but I've not been able to
think of a principled way of dealing with it. I do not regard the
above hack as principled because there are zero limits on it.
> Is ${sg} not a suitable expansion to de-taint $local_part or $domain?
No - because there are no limits on it, and I see no way for Exim
to interpret the replacement pattern in a $(sg) to infer useful limits.
Possibly some form of operator which had the semantics of
"anything below this given path is fair game" would work. But it
could not be a general de-tainting string expansion, because taint
not only prevents use as a file path but also prevents further
expansion.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
