On 2019-02-15, Jasen Betts via Exim-users <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2019-02-14, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <[email protected]> wrote: >> Summary: >> >> On 13/02/2019 05:41, Jasen Betts via Exim-users wrote: >>> Should it be doing that? >> They should be stripped. >> >>> (I could write a patch if this is a bug) >> >> That would be very useful.
> I'll also have a look at the code behind "exim -t" email header parsing, it turned out that the exim -t header passing works correctly but the expansion code was misusing that parsing code. the fixed code is actually shorter that the old code. I have submitted a patch: https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2375 I'm not sure if I should be free()ing "t" in that code - the old code wasn't. I guess exim will clean that up automatically. -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
