On 07/10/17 14:14, The Doctor wrote: > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:25:35AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: >> Is the Exim binary setuid?
> > This is ufs and the exim binary is set to 1755 That's a "no", then; at least on my FreeBSD system here, "1755" shows as "rwxr-xr-t" with "ls -l". That leading "1" is a sticky-bit not a setuid bit. > In file included from ./exim.h:492: > ./macros.h:231:3: error: expected identifier > DTYPE_NONE, > ^ > /usr/include/sys/file.h:56:20: note: expanded from macro 'DTYPE_NONE' > #define DTYPE_NONE 0 /* not yet initialized */ > ^ This looks like a system include on FreeBSD has defined a name which exim was already defining for its own purposes; a conflict. Someone else mentioned this recently but I don't recall the outcome. For now I suggest you edit all mentions of "DTYPE_NONE" in the exim source to "EXIM_DTYPE_NONE". -- Cheers, Jeremy -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
