Thanks, Jeremy… I feared that might be the case but nursed a hope it would be an easy way out of my problem: having two separate authenticator mechanisms.
(I've read and re-read the *Specification* but couldn't spot it saying anywhere that only one authenticator mechanism was permitted for a given public-name.) I'm going to do yet more debugging with my two-source check today, but am still baffled why at one point it seems to correctly generate the 5xx response but at some point as I tweak the expression it changes to fail with the string expansion error that leads to a 4xx response. Has anyone managed to get a two-source check for authentication working properly, with the second using LDAP? Cheers, Mike B-) On 8 August 2017 at 21:04, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/08/17 19:00, Mike Brudenell via Exim-users wrote: > > PS: Am I right in thinking you can only have one authenticator for each > > type: LOGIN, PLAIN, etc? > > You can only have one authenticator with a given public-name. > -- > Jeremy > > -- > ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/ > -- Systems Administrator & Change Manager IT Services, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK Tel: +44-(0)1904-323811 Web: www.york.ac.uk/it-services Disclaimer: www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
