On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:11 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:21, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:13 +0000, Always Learning wrote: > >> > >> I thought the only RFC required header was Message-ID: ? > > > > That's only a SHOULD. > > When I was young, a "SHOULD" wasn't only an "only", it was a pretty > big deal, it was a MUST with some opportunity for leniency. :)
True. I spent a long time rejecting all messages without a Message-Id. I eventually gave up on it, after a number of "false positives" that were annoying my users. Even rejecting for having no Date: header gives "false positives". NatWest are completely incompetent and send statements with no Date header, and fail to understand the complaint when I report it to them. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
