On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:10:19PM +0000, Bryn Jones wrote: > On 19 Nov 2009, at 14:23, Joe Doehler <j...@doehler.us> wrote: > > > Andrew wrote: > >>> Minor point - shouldn't that be 192.168.0.0/16 or 192.168.1.0/24 > >>> or even > >>> 192.0.0.0/8. > >>> > > > > Thanks to all who have answered. The suggestions solved my problem. > > FYI, > > this is a small network that's content with 256 IP addresses. > > If it's supposed to be a 255.255.255.0, you want 192.168.1.0/24. /8 is > the same as 255.0.0.0, or 2^24-2 hosts.
That and 192.0.0.0/8 contains millions of legitimate routable hosts. Only 192.168.x.x addresses (192.168.0.0/16) can be used for private space without adverse affects. Everything else is legitimate routable space. -- Dean Brooks d...@iglou.com -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
