Chris Searle wrote: > On 7. april. 2008, at 10.10, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > >> On 07.04.2008 10:00, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: >>> Is there anybody else who had the same problem? >> ACK. >> >> The freshclam daemon obviously locked the database long enough for >> clamd >> to time out retrying to obtain a lock on the DB. So it ended itself. > > Same here. > > One thing I wonder - with the following setting: > > av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl > > Is there any way to configure exim to say that instead of rejecting > when this is missing in /var/run - allow mail as normal - just add a X- > something-sensible here header to say that mail was not virus scanned? >
Someone asked about this kind of thing last year and I suggested they use the clamd PING to see if it's there. They took that idea and created an awesome little system and posted the entire thing to the mailing list. You could use something very similar to test to see if clamd is working and if it's not, skip or defer the malware tests. The existence of the socket file does not mean that clamd is running, just that it wasn't deleted if clamd crashed. It's available in the archive here: http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20070918.172526.ff9818ec.en.html -- The Exim Manual http://www.exim.org/docs.html http://docs.exim.org/current/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
