On 04/10/2007, Andrew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't see it was useless, as the only chage was an IP address. I also > disagree with the wiki page. Some of the systems I deal with contain > protectively marked IP addresses which would be inappropriate to reproduced > here - does that mean I shouldn't ask for help with Exim because I can't > post my log lines in full ?
No, this issue needs treating with common sense. If you obfuscate (either because you need to as you've pointed out, or because you feel like it), then the quality of the support you get may suffer. Not usually deliberately, but as a result of confusion and potential obfuscation typos. This doesn't mean you shouldn't post. But a note saying 'sorry about the obfuscation, I've no choice' will help avoid an unnecessary side-conversation. Peter (Moderator hat on) ($BIGCLIENT deals with UK govt secure email, so I know your problems) (oops, shouldn't have said that - why is there a big bloke in a suit approaching my desk.....) -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
