Phil Pennock skrev:
(1) You route the +gateway_for_domains separately in the Routers
section, before the send-to-MX router. Look at the "manualroute"
driver. Something like (untested):
That works fine, I've no problem with this. as I said, it's accept rules thats the problem, because I can't set what MX verify = recipe uses.
(2) To make it actually talk to a remote server to verify the address,
if that's what you're trying to do, you need the ACL to have:
"verify = recipient/callout=<some.options.here>"
(see: 40.37 Additional parameters for callouts)
I've checked left, right and center of the manual and googled all night to boot, I just can't see how it's possible to tell the accept rule to use the "hidden" system for username@ verification, where do I tell it to use hidden.domain.com for the callout, it just tries to use it self and tells me thats stupid.
callout is 40.41 in the latest manual.Getting things to forward mail to the hidden system after ACCEPT is easy, but I want the system to refuse accepting any mails the hidden system would if it was accepting the calls directly.
If I use the relays_to_domain and it's verify = recipe/callout everything it fine, because localhost isn't primary MX, but the point is that only system that can talk to the hidden system is the mail gateway, so the hidden system isn't going to be a MX. If it was the gateway system becomes pointless.
reroute_domains:
driver = manualroute
domains = +gateway_for_domains
route_data = ${lookup{$domain}lsearch{/etc/exim/domain_routes}}
transport = remote_smtp
no_more
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
