Sorry, I didn't to include the rules which I use to do the per-user scanning.
In
too much of a hurry and pressed send too soon...
This is the router which makes the decision:
driver = accept
no_verify
check_local_user
require_files = $home/.spamassassin/user_prefs
debug_print = running spamtest router for
condition = ${if eq {$received_protocol}{spam-scanned}{no}{yes}}
transport = spamcheck_transport
the above checks for the existence of the users .spamassissin/user_prefs (only
if the protocol isn't spam-scanned, this is important to avoid loops) and is
never run when verifying recipients.
The accompanying transport is:
spamcheck_transport:
driver = pipe
use_bsmtp
headers_remove =
X-Spam-Score:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Flag:X-Spam-Checker-Version:X-Spam-Report:X-Spam-Level:
command = /usr/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS
transport_filter = /usr/bin/spamc -f -s 5000000 -u $local_part
user = mail
log_output = true
return_fail_output = true
return_path_add = false
message_prefix =
message_suffix =
In order to set the message protocol to spam-scanned, the transport cannot be
run as the recipient, here I use mail. This also has the added caveat that the
users .spamassassin/user_prefs file *must* be readable by that user, here I set
them to be readable by group mail. I also strip any existing SA headers to
avoid
confusion. I can't remember why I have the message_prefix and message_suffix
set...
--
Nigel Wade, System Administrator, Space Plasma Physics Group,
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone : +44 (0)116 2523548, Fax : +44 (0)116 2523555
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
