On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Dave Lugo wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Philip Hazel wrote: > > > > > This doesn't work real well for spammers or other b0rken MTAs that > > > don't gracefully end the SMTP session. Are there any plans for > > > an `acl_smtp_left_in_a_huff` or similar? > > > > Not that I know of. > > > > Um, could it be added to the wishlist?
Maybe that acl should carry some interrogatable status with it that denotes the nature of the "end of conversation", rather than having one specifically for the different cases, then you can conditionalise things with it. Jethro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jethro R Binks Computing Officer, IT Services University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
