On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Philip Hazel wrote: > > Since I can't seem to take any action to fix it, maybe it doesn't > > belong in the paniclog at all? (Paniclog entries set off all kinds of > > alarm-bells around here, so it would be nice to not have this firing > > off so often). > > It's probably there because I assumed that getsockname() shouldn't ever > fail when I wrote the code, long ago. You are probably right in that > this particular failure doesn't belong in paniclog. I'll do something > about that.
I'd really appreciate that. I've also posted about this issue in the past; I concur with the view that this is a "spam has got worse" problem - I get a notification when stuff appears in paniclog, and the notifications have increased hugely over the past year and even few months. Annoyingly so. J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jethro R Binks Computing Officer, IT Services University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
