I Agree, I would not expect dnf to do that checking but I assume the package developers would not make data changes in minor versions but only on major versions and dnf does not downgrade over major version automatically. There probably is a way to tell dnf to do that (I don't actually know) but I would not do that for this sort of reason.
Thanks again advise is always welcome and useful. -- Thanks Luigi -----Original Message----- From: Patrick O'Callaghan <p...@usb.ve> To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] B&W font used by evolution 3.44.3-1.fc36 problem Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:53:00 +0100 Mailer: Evolution 3.44.3 (3.44.3-1.fc36) On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 07:30 +0800, Luigi Cantoni via evolution-list wrote: > I only ever downgrade what dnf will allow automatically so I assume > if there is some sort of incompatibility then the developers would > not allow it. I could be wrong. I think that's very naive. The dnf downgrade process only looks at package dependencies. It certainly does *not* look at your local data to see if it's backward compatible. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
